News:

SMF - installed December 2017.
Returning members - please use the 'Forgot Password' function when logging in to the new Forum for the first time. If you have changed your email address please let me know so I can update it.

Main Menu

New book: AC Cars 1904 - 2009

Started by MkIV Lux, August 30, 2010, 08:36:59

Previous topic - Next topic

MkIV Lux


Robin A Woolmer

I hope it has fresh information on the AC Company & cars!

ACOCArch

The book was reviewed in the May 2010 ACtion page 34 with a special offer to ACOC Members on page 35

MkIV Lux

quote:
Originally posted by ACOCArch
   
The book was reviewed in the May 2010 ACtion page 34 with a special offer to ACOC Members on page 35
   

   [:I] oh... missed that

AC Ace Bristol

Constant
   
   You're not the only one.  Wonder how much New Information, New Facts Data and Pictures are in this £64.00 book,  Best wait and see, [;)] then wait a little longer and you should be able to buy it at half the price [:)] .....  not being tight, Just seems a bit steep if it lacks  much or any new material !!   Unfortunately the ACtion review,gave Little or no indication of the quantity of new material. Conclusion:- a good addition to your  reference library.
   
   Has any one else bought or read a copy... Your Views Please [?]
   
   Keith

nikbj68

quote:
Originally posted by AC Ace Bristol...Best wait and see, [;)] then wait a little longer and you should be able to buy it at half the price [:)] Keith

   
   
Well, so far, only 5% off this one at Amazin' dot com:

   

   
   ...isn`t it`s a shame you can`t just buy an 'addendum' if you already have these 2:

   
   
 

   
   LOL! [;)]

administrator

It's the standard Brooklands Books format: a collection of road tests across the entire history of AC.  How much is new depends on how many of the articles you have seen.  I had not seen a lot of the early ones.  The reproduction quality is better than many of the earlier Brooklands issues but they have squashed some of the later tests to fit the page size, so the aspect ratio of the photos is wrong on those articles.